The Barra Velha do Monte Pascoal Indigenous Land is located in the municipalities of Prado, Itamaraju and Porto Seguro in the far south of the state of Bahia. It has historically been inhabited by the Patax\u00f3 people and is comprised of 12 villages: Barra Velha (the main village), Boca da Mata, Meio da Mata, Guaxuma, Trevo do Parque, P\u00e9 do Monte, Aldeia Nova, \u00c1guas Belas, Corumbauzinho, Craveiro, Cassiana and Bugig\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Monte Pascoal is described in Pero Vaz de Caminha\u2019s famous letter about the Portuguese \u201cdiscovery\u201d of Brazil. According to historic records, it was the first land that the Portuguese invaders saw upon arrival here in 1500. This place is still the sad stage for rights violations against the Patax\u00f3, who, as everyone must be aware, originally come from this region. Expulsions of Indigenous people and different agrarian conflicts have historically taken place here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Parque Nacional do Monte Pascoal (PNMP) [Monte Pascoal National Park] was created by Decree n\u00ba 2.729\/1943 signed by then President Get\u00falio Vargas. It governed the first phase of the Park\u2019s creation, which took some time to get off the drawing board. It is an established fact that, a few years later, the Prado and Porto Seguro police committed a criminal act against the Patax\u00f3, which led to their diaspora and remains important in their memory. Known as the \u201cFire of 51\u201d, it is considered to be one of the bloodiest massacres ever, and the Patax\u00f3 remember it with great sadness. Many people were killed, persecuted and brutally beaten. They were compelled to flee to other areas. The violence also led to the forced separation of numerous Patax\u00f3 families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Physical implementation of the 22,500 hectare Monte Pascoal National Park didn\u2019t occur until 1961. It greatly changed the routine of the Indigenous families who inhabited that important piece of land, long occupied by Indigenous people. From the very beginning, the establishment of the Park ignored the presence of the Indigenous people in the area. This created strong tensions between the Indigenous people and the environmental authorities, which continues until today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Monte Pascoal National Park was created because of the great diversity of flora and fauna of the Atlantic Forest biome found there. However, implementation of the Park directly affected the lives of the Patax\u00f3, who have inhabited the area for hundreds of years. They became unable to plant their crops and occupy areas that had previously been at their disposal. This greatly altered their socio-cultural situation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In response to this instability, vulnerability, insecurity and neglect by the Government, the Patax\u00f3, and the Patax\u00f3 H\u00e3h\u00e3h\u00e3e, began to organize. Their goal was to return to the areas that they all understood to be part of their traditional lands. This led to land retakings, considered to be an important tool in the struggle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On 19 August 1999, the Patax\u00f3 executed an important retaking in the Monte Pascoal region, in an attempt to gain control of the park. This led the Minist\u00e9rio P\u00fablico Federal [Federal Public Ministry] to recommend that the National Indian Foundation (Funai) reassess the boundaries of the Barra Velha Indigenous Land. As a result, on 29 February 2008, the Relat\u00f3rio Circunstanciado de Identifica\u00e7\u00e3o e Delimita\u00e7\u00e3o (RCID) [Circumstantiated Identification and Delimitation Report] for the Indigenous Land was published in the official federal register, the Di\u00e1rio Oficial da Uni\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As can be seen, since the establishment of the Monte Pascoal National Park, the Patax\u00f3 have been waging a difficult fight to remain in areas inside the park where they were the original inhabitants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Logging company activities in the Indigenous Land also directly threaten the Indigenous people. The loggers move in with force, destroying forests and compromising the lives of communities that depend on its natural resources to produce handicrafts and for their daily sustenance. There is also a conflict with non-Indigenous farmers who allege they own land in areas proven to be occupied by the Patax\u00f3. Most cultivate cacao and coffee, others practice eucalyptus monoculture, which destroys water sources and forests and pollutes the rivers, soils and the entire ecosystem. This directly harms the Patax\u00f3 who live in the region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is important to note other instances of territorial overlapping faced by the Barra Velha Indigenous Land. In addition to the conspicuous case of the National Park discussed above, there is the Cara\u00edva\/Trancoso Environmental Protection Area (APA) and the Museu Aberto do Descobrimento [Open Air Discovery Museum]. Strong persecution persists against leaders of this Indigenous Land. For instance, Joel Braz, an important Patax\u00f3 leader, suffered intense persecution and reprisals, and had to take shelter in different communities, while fleeing <\/p>\n\n\n\n
charges of theft and kidnapping, in a clear case of criminalization. Joel Braz spent 11 years under house arrest until 2017 when a jury absolved him of murder charges relating to the 2002 death of a gunman, which took place during a conflict between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in the area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Currently, Covid-19 poses yet another threat to this population, highlighting the neglect of government agencies responsible for enforcing Indigenous rights. The residents of the Indigenous Land have been abandoned by the government. There are no hospital facilities near the communities to handle a possible need for treatment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Indigenous population which resides in the Barra Velha Indigenous Land has suffered from the virus ever since it began to spread among the municipalities in the region. Indigenous people need to visit cities such as Itamaraju, Itabela and Porto Seguro, to buy food and have access to services and commerce in general.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to special bulletin n\u00ba 18, published on 28 September 2020 by the Associa\u00e7\u00e3o Nacional de A\u00e7\u00e3o Indigenista (Ana\u00ed) [National Association for Indigenous Action] and the Movimento Unido dos Povos e Organiza\u00e7\u00f5es Ind\u00edgenas da Bahia [United Movement of Indigenous Peoples and Organizations of Bahia], the village of Barra Velha (with the second highest Patax\u00f3 population in Bahia) is currently registering an alarming increase in cases, totaling 110. This represents about 20% of all Indigenous cases in the far south of Bahia since the first Indigenous cases were recorded. This rise in cases is due to the arrival of many tourists, who have direct contact with Indigenous people who depend on craft sales near the village, as at Cara\u00edva. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Thus, the pandemic has increased Indigenous people\u2019s fears. According to the leadership, this is because they receive no support from government agencies such as: Funai, the Secretaria Especial de Sa\u00fade Ind\u00edgena (Sesai\/MS) [Special Secretariat of Indigenous Health], the Centro de Refer\u00eancia de Assist\u00eancia Social (CRAS) [Reference Center for Indigenous Social Assistance], or the governments of the municipalities where the Indigenous Land is located.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The Barra Velha do Monte Pascoal Indigenous Land is located in the municipalities of Prado, Itamaraju and Porto Seguro in the far south of the state of Bahia. It has historically been inhabited by the Patax\u00f3 people and is comprised of 12 villages: Barra Velha (the main village), Boca da Mata, Meio da Mata, Guaxuma, … Continued<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"coauthors":[12],"class_list":["post-1025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conflicts"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1025"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1283,"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1025\/revisions\/1283"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1025"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/umoutroceu.ufba.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}